If Research Days were like Saints’ Days, then my Tuesdays would be Research Day Eves! Normally, I’m busy being a librarian on a Tuesday, but since I have a day’s leave, I can look ahead to what’s in store tomorrow.
Firstly, we’ve had several offers of blogposts, so to help with the planning, I’m contemplating setting up a Doodle-poll (or something similar) so that interested people can commit themselves a bit more definitely, and we get some sense of what’s next. Research Doodle-poll.
I need to set up some more meetings, after last week’s very productive mission to Edinburgh. Quite a few meetings, in fact.
I need to tidy up the rest of my bibliography – or what I’ve got so far – so that I can post it online and share it more widely. I’d love to be notified of any other useful reading that I’ve missed.
Bibliographer to the last, I need to check out the various commissions to examine universities and their libraries, in the Georgian/early Victorian era. I need precise citations for reports for ALL the legal deposit libraries involved in those commissions. Not quite sure how I’ll get round to reading them all, but the first objective is to identify them all. They aren’t always all that easy to trace, and sometimes library copies don’t have title pages – a bit of a setback, you could say!
My apologies that no podcast has happened for a couple of weeks; inspiration hasn’t descended upon me, and at present I’m hoarse, if not speechless. A podcast will happen soon, rest assured. (At least 21st century scholars have more effective cold remedies than our early 19th century forbears!)
I should confess at the outset, that this is a reflective piece, rather than a seriously documented aspect of the legal deposit music research. It outlines what can best be described as a playful attempt to describe the legal deposit process by evoking the imagined sounds of the early nineteenth century. I was contemplating different ways to bring the story alive to an audience unfamiliar with the context of my research. After I’d told the story in what I hoped was an accessible and reasonably lively way, I continued to reflect upon ways of utilising other media to enliven things another time.
I offer you two SoundCloud recordings today, firstly a podcast update, which goes on to outline my experimentation with making a playlist of appropriate sound-effects.
For the purposes of transparency, the individual audio-clips in the Soundscape are listed below, acknowledging the sources and durations. My thanks go to their creators. I particularly thank Alessandro Cesaro and Simone Laghi for uploading their beautiful performances to SoundCloud. They’re wonderful!
Only by listening to the podcasts will you be able to discern why the other audio-clips – all sound effects – were chosen!
Michelle’s Pen on Paper (0:10) / Kate Baker Music
Wrapping Parcel (0:31) / SoundMods
Sound Effect of Door Opening 0:06) / Switcher12
Door Slamming Shut (0:02) / Amy-Jane Wilson 1
Footsteps Sound Effects (0:08 ) / l13hk
Horse on Cobbles at Münster (0:30) / Simon Velo
Boat at Sea (1:58) / Misha Rogov
In Bruges / Clip & Clop (0:30) / Bib-6
Door Open And Close Puerta Abriendo Y Cerrando 2 (0:50) / FX Sounds
Turning Pages (0:05) / Angela Morris
L. Dussek Rosline Castle with variations, piano (5:02) / Alessandro Cesaro
I’m reading a book about research impact at the moment. (We have a copy in the library, but I’ve also got it on Kindle, so I have no excuse not to plough right through it!) I must admit, there are moments when I metaphorically kick myself under the table, because some of the advice is basically common sense. But, if it’s common sense, why didn’t I think of it? So it’s a good idea to get reminded of the obvious things whilst simultaneously getting plenty of fresh ideas, and just generally making sure that impact is built into this research network right from the very start.
So, here are the first questions, quoted directly from my new guru (Mark S. Reed, author of the Research Impact Handbook, pp.72-73):-
“What aspects of [our] research might be interesting or useful to someone?…”
“Could [our] research help address these needs [ie, issues, policy areas … trends]?”
Can our research help remove barriers that are currently inhibiting these areas?
If we know who might benefit from our research, can we identify “what aspects of [our] research they are likely to be most interested in?” Could we make it even more relevant?
So, what changes could our research effect?
And do we know who would benefit and who we should guard against disadvantaging?
Please don’t leave these questions hanging in the air! I’m looking for answers, and I’m keen to engage with other researchers interested in similar issues in this curious world where musicology, book history and library history meet with legal deposit on the one hand, and individual music-makers on the other. Do share your views!